r1dermon Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 im also interested in NO6- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldmanbeefjerky Posted June 23, 2011 Share Posted June 23, 2011 its impossible to keep it existing without specialist equitment keeping it under special conditions. i wouldnt worry about it, its unlikely youll ever, EVER find it, touch it, or even see it.now please, back on topic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mumbles Posted June 23, 2011 Share Posted June 23, 2011 I'm still interested in any reference to what the specialist equipment is, or a reference to any of this being possible. That is if you don't think I'm too stupid to comprehend it. I have full academic journal access, so don't worry about me not being able to retrieve it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r1dermon Posted June 23, 2011 Share Posted June 23, 2011 Ill never see francium, but that didn't stop me from writing a 10 page paper on it in college. If something like NO6- has ever been created, i think most people would agree, that's a pretty important event in chemistry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldmanbeefjerky Posted June 23, 2011 Share Posted June 23, 2011 However i do not share the same views and do not care much for it. Please keep on topic or don't write up anything at all, thermite is a topic that usually doesn't get much further than "mix iron and aluminium powder and then burn. people want to search through here looking for detailed information on thermite, not the hypothetical NO6- . Now, ill admit i have no clue into the specifics of the equipment, such as names, OK, i know they exist, ive heard about such things and the temporary creation of normally unstable compounds ( unstable bonds like NO6), which behave enough to other compounds to use them in place of the actual, more difficult to acquire, or hypothetical compounds, by my chemistry teacher last year. I'm sorry i cant go into more specific things. you know all that i know, and Google only need know a small bit of what you know to show you what you want to know. i beleive my teacher said, when explaining atomic bonds, that nitrate (NO3) is 3 oxygen bonded to 1 nitrogen, which is as much as the nitrogen will accept. if we were to try to add more oxygen, under certain conditions that would allow it to accept more oxygen, it would decompose the moment it is bonded back to NO3, but if t=we were to sudenly remove 1 nitrogen from a di-nitrate ( x(NO3)2), like manganese i think, the compound could be kept under certain conditions (which i do not know, she didn't go into further detail, it may have been hypothetical, involving going to 0 kelvin) ,it may be suspended, and wont decompose into NO3, essentially giving you a xNO6. as i mentioned before, it cant be used because it is too unstable, and perhaps requires temperatures of 0 kelvin to remain stable. and that's all i know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts