Jump to content
APC Forum

Rocket CATO at U of Idaho sends 4 to hospital


AzoMittle

Recommended Posts

Just saw this, it is sad and my best wishes to the students and their families; it does sound like they had caught a case of the stupids though.

http://www.idahostatesman.com/news/state/idaho/article144582304.html

Four students were injured, at least one seriously, when a rocket engineering club’s experiment exploded in a campus parking lot Thursday night, University of Idaho officials say.
...
The student chapter of Northwest Organization of Rocket Engineers was conducting an experiment on rocket fuel and was not attempting to launch a rocket or other projectile, Ewart said.
The device used for the experiment was a galvanized metal pipe, 8 to 12 inches long and about 1.5 inches in diameter. It was placed on a wooden pallet that was destroyed in the explosion, he said.
The students reportedly wore protective gear, and Ewart said a faculty adviser was on hand for the experiment.
...
He said the student who lit the fuel was wearing a face shield, and club members watching wore eye protection, the Daily News reports. The other co-president who stood near the explosion wore eye protection but not a face shield, he said.


I'm sorry but wearing a cheap face shield and some plastic lab glasses does not constitute safety gear when you are hand-lighting a 12 inch galvanized steel pipe full of experimental homemade rocket fuel.

The article also states that the student who lit it is in critical condition but expected to recover, the other 3 had minor surgery and are now stable. The FBI is investigating but is not considering it a criminal matter; meanwhile we make some sparklers and you would think it was the end of the world...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Metal pipe as the casing for an experimental test of propellant at that scale? That doesn't seem that smart.

 

I wonder what the propellant was and if it had been loaded/pressed correctly?

 

 

The FBI is investigating but is not considering it a criminal matter; meanwhile we make some sparklers and you would think it was the end of the world...

Haha, totally agree, they basically made a pipe bomb and its not a criminal matter. I wonder what would happen if we tried to explain that it was just a experimental rocket if that happened to any of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Metal pipe as the casing for an experimental test of propellant at that scale? That doesn't seem that smart.

 

I wonder what the propellant was and if it had been loaded/pressed correctly?

 

Metal in and of itself isn't a problem, IF you do the correct research and design and testing and calculations and so on; heck you can buy pre-milled aluminum cases for HPR, which are properly designed to blowout the end cap before rupturing so that even if/when they do fail they are much more likely to fail safely.

 

Someone mentioned they were using cast sugar fuel, I have no hard evidence of that though.

 

What's even scarier is that the school signed off on this when they clearly didn't have a well researched project proposal document.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This certainly shows the closeness between a rocket and a devastating accident. Even NASA has incidents. Lets hope that someone is able and willing to work out what happened in detail so that rocketry remains a respectable hobby rather than a forbidden practise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too bad they didn't at least try to seek out advice from some rocket engineers, galvanized pipe is wrong on so many levels and as engineering students, shame on them for not doing due diligence and researching ahead of time.

 

Gut feeling is that it's a boys acting like boys thing and they didn't do any math but after having a few adult beverages came up with the idea and all the engineering was by the seat of their pants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold my glass beaker of fermented sugars while I light this fuse.

That is how you do it while getting a degree.

Any kind of barrier would have helped in reducing the potential injuries from the galvanized pipe fragments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For wisdom after the event, wouldn't a 100m wire and an igniter have been a sensible option, But they were boys and invincible -til it happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, obviously they didn't wax the pipe.

Possibly the most correct but hilarious post I've ever read. Dave you are in my personal Hall of Fame for that one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, obviously they didn't wax the pipe.

 

 

Alright, that was a coffee-out-the-nose moment, thanks Dave!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

How well equipped is this university? Wouldn't they have been able to have custom casings made for them, either at the university (they do have machine shops) or on contract with other department or companies. My university drops 400,000 dollars on equipment like it's nothing so I refuse to believe that they used galvanized metal pipe to be cheap...

 

I would have used pre hardened 4140 to test... once that works move onto lighter but stronger materials. I said pre hard 4140 because they have a very high yield strength. They are used to make gun barrels.

 

Also they should NOT be hand lighting anything, especially something unproven.

 

I think the faculty who oversaw this experiment needs to be disciplined.

Edited by taiwanluthiers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...